Regulating an international diamond trade stained by blood
Eric Witte March 19th, 2008
The BBC reports today that a new diamond processing plant is opening in Botswana, creating 3,000 jobs. Rough diamonds will no longer simply be shipped abroad to be cut, polished, marketed and sold. The welcome development is a reminder that efforts to regulate the international diamond trade must square the needs of places like Botswana with those of places where diamonds have brought nothing but ruin and despair.
“Blood diamonds” from other parts of Africa (and other continents), including Sierra Leone, Angola, and the Democratic Republic of Congo have fuelled conflict and spurred atrocities. Ongoing evidence in the war-crimes trial of former Liberian President Charles Taylor before the Special Court for Sierra Leone has featured fascinating and grisly details of how this worked in West Africa during the 1990s.* Diamond expert Ian Smillie of Partnership Africa Canada, the first prosecution witness called against Taylor, explained to the court in January that where geology is such that diamonds are spread far and wide by river systems (alluvial diamonds), basically anyone can become a diamond miner. Particularly in a country as desperately poor as Sierra Leone, this means that so-called “artisinal miners” are always tempted to flock to the diamond-rich areas of eastern Sierra Leone, shovels and sieves in hand. Smillie testified [PDF] that an authority wishing to keep the masses at bay has two options: employ a large security force, or conduct a reign of terror to scare them away. The Revolutionary United Front (RUF), backed by Taylor, pursued the latter option. Rape, mutilation and murder were means to control the diamond areas, and over the course of the war the diamond trade through Liberia became an increasingly important lifeline for the RUF.
Such open access to diamonds also makes accounting for the stones very difficult, and even after the war, Sierra Leone has been plagued by corruption in the diamond sector. While a small elite has prospered and there has been some incremental improvement in exportation of diamonds through official channels, most Sierra Leoneans have seen little or no benefit from the diamond trade in the past six years of peace.
By contrast, where geology is such that diamond reserves lie deep in the ground, heavy mining equipment is required to access the stones. There are no artisinal miners, and thus no rationale for terror. Centralized mining allows for much greater control of the stones, and accountability. This is the kind of diamond mining that takes place in such places as Botswana and South Africa.
Botswana, the world’s leading diamond producer, is among the best-governed countries in Africa. Successive democratic governments have managed to harness the country’s diamond resources to spur development and formation of a sizeable middle class. This record has been sullied by recent efforts to kick indigenous San peoples (”Bushmen”) off of their traditional lands in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve, which some allege is a prelude to expanded diamond mining there. Despite this serious blemish on Botswana’s record, the broad pattern of responsible use of diamond wealth holds.
Efforts to regulate the international diamond trade through the Kimberley Process are burdened by the complication that it is difficult to tell with certainty where diamonds come from, so that conflict and non-conflict diamonds are easily co-mingled in such trading centers as London, Antwerp and Tel-Aviv. As Global Witness and Partnership Africa Canada stressed in a joint November 2007 note [PDF] to a plenary meeting of the Kimberley Process, gaps in the Kimberley Process and lax enforcement have allowed illicit trading to continue, and there is much more that member countries can do to implement proper controls.
While geology may seem to dictate that the people of Botswana and Sierra Leone have divergent interests when it comes to the diamond trade, reliable controls are in the interests of both. A truly functional Kimberley Process can ensure that growing consciousness of the “blood diamond” problem does not diminish the market for the lifeblood of Botswana’s economy, while helping to establish the accountability necessary for Sierra Leone to put its natural resources to work for its people.
*Full disclosure: I’m a former employee of the SCSL, and have since worked as an occasional consultant for the Open Society Justice Initiative on the charlestaylortrial.org website.
